Angela Constance Addresses Controversy Over Ministerial Car Ride to Old Firm Game
Justice Secretary Angela Constance has recently addressed the controversy surrounding her travel arrangements to the Old Firm league cup final on Sunday. Constance, accompanied by a close family member, used a ministerial car to attend the game as guests of the Scottish Professional Football League (SPFL).
Constance’s attendance at the match has raised questions about the appropriate use of ministerial resources and the blurred lines between official duties and personal interests. This incident comes on the heels of Health Secretary Neil Gray’s apology for being chauffeured to multiple football matches involving his favorite team, Aberdeen, leading to accusations of prioritizing fandom over ministerial responsibilities.
Defending Her Actions
In a press conference held at Holyrood, Constance defended her decision to attend the football match, citing concerns about the increasing use of pyrotechnics at sporting events. While acknowledging that she is not a football enthusiast, Constance emphasized the importance of addressing safety issues within football stadiums and communities. She expressed her commitment to addressing the misuse of pyrotechnics and ensuring public safety remains a top priority.
Ministerial Code and Public Interest
The controversy surrounding Constance’s use of the ministerial car raises questions about adherence to the ministerial code. The recently revised code emphasizes the importance of using public transport when feasible and restricts the use of official cars by close family members to exceptional circumstances. However, the code allows for exceptions when the use of ministerial resources is deemed to be in the public interest.
Official Government Business
A Scottish Government spokesperson clarified that Constance’s attendance at the match was for official Government business. During her discussions with the SPFL, Constance focused on strategies to combat the illegal use of pyrotechnics at football matches and observed the security measures in place during such events.
In light of these developments, the public remains divided on whether Constance’s actions were justified or if they demonstrate a misuse of ministerial privileges. As the debate continues, it raises broader questions about transparency, accountability, and the responsibilities of public officials in balancing personal interests with official duties.